Kdaj bo BTC 10k EUR
Pričakovanje, ne živčki. Ko prebije, bo šlo samo še gor. Te bom spomnila, kaj sem napisala. Pred časom sem napovedala 30 % rast vseh valut do konca leta.
[/quote]
Na kakšni osnovi pa temelji tvoja strokovna ocena?
Na osnovi poznavanja človeške narave in pohlepa?
Na ekonomskih kriterijih?
Ker verjameš v Božička?
😉
tukaj so že preko 10k$ ☺
Drugače je od trenutka, ko sem ti to napisala, tretjina pri nekaterih valutah že skoraj dosežena. Ko bi imela čas, bi ti pokazala zapis. Torej sem rast še podcenila, ker smo še daleč od konca leta.
[/quote]
Še vedno nisi odgovorila na čem temelji tvoje zaupanje v (današnje) kripto – razen na pohlepu?
Še vedno nisi odgovorila na čem temelji tvoje zaupanje v (današnje) kripto – razen na pohlepu?
[/quote]
In če zaupaš v moč človeškega pohlepa, si strokovnjak za človeško psiho, ne za kripto… 😉
Ne gre za nobeno zaupanje, ampak dejstva. Odgovorila sem ti, če hočeš razumet, je pa tvoja stvar.
[/quote]
Evo, nekaj “pravljic” kredibilnih avtorjev:
Chris Robert, currently an Adjunct Lecturer in Public Policy at Harvard:
It would really be something if intelligent people chose to invest more trust in a currency system built and managed, in large part, by anonymous computer hackers than they did in currency systems built and managed by governments of the people, by the people. Fortunately, we are not there yet. Today, Bitcoin is mostly just a matter of media speculation arising from the continuing financial turmoil and growing distrust in the global financial system. This media speculation may well lead to a protracted period of financial speculation, however, during which techies are joined by increasing numbers of financial sophisticates seeking a new bubble to exploit.
Compared with corporate securities, futures, or even derivatives, Bitcoin is even less inhibited by any underlying sense of value. The bubble can just grow and grow, so long as demand increases faster than supply — and so long as the network doesn’t crash, a new cryptographic exploit doesn’t unravel everything, the fundamental lack of anonymity doesn’t bother anyone, those who lose private keys and thus potentially small fortunes don’t complain too loudly, improvements (or hacks) to “mining” don’t lead to sudden shocks to supply, etc. Profiting from a bubble of any sort can be a risky business, but our global economy is not at all lacking in people willing to give it a go. Thus, as a potentially exciting new vehicle for financial speculation, Bitcoin may be with us for some time.
Matthew Bishop, currently the U.S. Editor for The Economist, where he’s been for 22 years:
As I wrote in my recent ebook on the future of money, “In Gold We Trust?“, the resurrection of gold and the emergence of Bitcoin are two sides of the same, er, coin. Both are a response to falling confidence in the soundness of government-backed ‘fiat’ money in an era of quantitative easing. I think the algorithmic approach to controlling the money supply used by Bitcoin and other digital currencies being developed in Silicon Valley could go a long way to creating a sound store of value. The biggest risk to these currencies may turn out to be government action to destroy an alternative to fiat money. But what if a sovereign state was to issue an algorithm-based currency? Would that drive fiat money out of business?
Evo, nekaj “pravljic” kredibilnih avtorjev:
Chris Robert, currently an Adjunct Lecturer in Public Policy at Harvard:
It would really be something if intelligent people chose to invest more trust in a currency system built and managed, in large part, by anonymous computer hackers than they did in currency systems built and managed by governments of the people, by the people. Fortunately, we are not there yet. Today, Bitcoin is mostly just a matter of media speculation arising from the continuing financial turmoil and growing distrust in the global financial system. This media speculation may well lead to a protracted period of financial speculation, however, during which techies are joined by increasing numbers of financial sophisticates seeking a new bubble to exploit.
Compared with corporate securities, futures, or even derivatives, Bitcoin is even less inhibited by any underlying sense of value. The bubble can just grow and grow, so long as demand increases faster than supply — and so long as the network doesn’t crash, a new cryptographic exploit doesn’t unravel everything, the fundamental lack of anonymity doesn’t bother anyone, those who lose private keys and thus potentially small fortunes don’t complain too loudly, improvements (or hacks) to “mining” don’t lead to sudden shocks to supply, etc. Profiting from a bubble of any sort can be a risky business, but our global economy is not at all lacking in people willing to give it a go. Thus, as a potentially exciting new vehicle for financial speculation, Bitcoin may be with us for some time.
Matthew Bishop, currently the U.S. Editor for The Economist, where he’s been for 22 years:
As I wrote in my recent ebook on the future of money, “In Gold We Trust?“, the resurrection of gold and the emergence of Bitcoin are two sides of the same, er, coin. Both are a response to falling confidence in the soundness of government-backed ‘fiat’ money in an era of quantitative easing. I think the algorithmic approach to controlling the money supply used by Bitcoin and other digital currencies being developed in Silicon Valley could go a long way to creating a sound store of value. The biggest risk to these currencies may turn out to be government action to destroy an alternative to fiat money. But what if a sovereign state was to issue an algorithm-based currency? Would that drive fiat money out of business?
[/quote]
zakaj je bilo pol treba dokapitalizirati NKBM, BLB, so propadle banke, smo jih prodali ….
btw: zakaj so ZDA umaknile vezavo $ na zlato …
zakaj imamo inflacije in deflacije …
toliko o relevantnosti članka ☺