Najdi forum

Splash Forum Politični čvek Zgodovina Britanski imperij

Zgodovina Britanski imperij

Iz clanka
http://www.solidarity.net.au/highlights/nothing-to-celebrate-in-anzac-the-bloody-history-of-the-british-empire/

Britain began constructing its empire in Ireland, effectively its first colony. In 1609 it drove local peasants off their lands and settled English and Scottish colonists in the “plantation of Ulster” as an effort to maintain control. Huge rents were imposed on Irish peasant farmers that kept them in poverty.

The failure of the potato crop between 1845 and 1852 caused a famine in which one million died. Although Ireland was still producing enough to feed the population, the British government allowed merchants and landlords to continue exporting grain abroad for profits while its people starved.

After 1690 Britain shipped three million African slaves to its profitable sugar plantations in the Caribbean. This regime of unimaginable brutality relied on literally working slaves to death: the lifespan of those that survived the trip across the Atlantic was just seven to ten years. Savage punishments were required to maintain it. The Baptist missionary William Knibb recorded that, “flogging on the estates is as common as eating almost”.

There were constant slave revolts and resistance. In 1791 a revolt swept the French slave colony of St Dominique, spreading across much of the rest of the Caribbean. By 1798 Britain had lost 55,000 soldiers putting down the rebellions. A further massive revolt followed in Jamaica in 1831.

It was these rebellions that convinced the British ruling class of the need to abolish slavery. The importance of the plantations in generating their wealth was also in decline as Britain developed as an industrial power. Yet even when they ended slavery in 1833, it was the slave owners who received compensation, not the slaves.

Iz clanka:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/thereporters/soutikbiswas/2010/10/how_churchill_starved_india.html

Some three million Indians died in the famine of 1943. The majority of the deaths were in Bengal. In a shocking new book, Churchill’s Secret War, journalist Madhusree Mukherjee blames Mr Churchill’s policies for being largely responsible for one of the worst famines in India’s history. It is a gripping and scholarly investigation into what must count as one of the most shameful chapters in the history of the Empire.

The scarcity, Mukherjee writes, was caused by large-scale exports of food from India for use in the war theatres and consumption in Britain – India exported more than 70,000 tonnes of rice between January and July 1943, even as the famine set in. This would have kept nearly 400,000 people alive for a full year. Mr Churchill turned down fervent pleas to export food to India citing a shortage of ships – this when shiploads of Australian wheat, for example, would pass by India to be stored for future consumption in Europe. As imports dropped, prices shot up and hoarders made a killing. Mr Churchill also pushed a scorched earth policy – which went by the sinister name of Denial Policy – in coastal Bengal where the colonisers feared the Japanese would land. So authorities removed boats (the lifeline of the region) and the police destroyed and seized rice stocks.

Iz clanka:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/two-million-in-bosnia-are-on-brink-of-starvation-1484349.html

BOSNIA is facing an impending humanitarian catastrophe, the United Nations aid chief said yesterday as she called an emergency meeting of donor countries this week to stave off the total collapse of the aid operation.

Sadako Ogata, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, said the organisation had only three weeks of supplies left to feed about 2 million Bosnians depending for survival on UN handouts. ‘We’re getting to the point where the space for humanitarian action is just no longer there,’ she said.

Iz clanka:
http://www.dw.de/german-agriculture-exports-hit-new-record/a-16192144

German agriculture exports hit new record

German agricultural firms are exporting more produce than ever before. Shipments abroad have reached a new high, but results have been dampened by the ongoing debt crisis in much of the euro area.

Slavna slika Tito in Churchill
http://cdn2.fototeka.sabh.hr/cdn/Susret_Tito_-_Churchill_u_Napulju,_12._kolovoz_1944..jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_II_of_Yugoslavia

Peter II of Yugoslavia, also known as Peter II Karađorđević (Serbo-Croatian: Petar II Karađorđević, Serbian Cyrillic: Петар II Карађорђевић; 6 September 1923 – 3 November 1970), was the third and last King of Yugoslavia and the last reigning member of the Karađorđević dynasty, founded early in the 19th century. Peter II was the eldest son of King Alexander I and Queen Maria (born Princess of Romania); his godfather was George V of the United Kingdom.

Postponing Operation Barbarossa, Germany simultaneously attacked Yugoslavia and Greece. Within a week, Germany, Bulgaria, Hungary and Italy invaded Yugoslavia and the government was forced to surrender on 17 April. Yugoslavia was divided to satisfy Italian, Bulgarian, Hungarian and German demands.

Peter left the country with the Yugoslav government following the Axis invasion;[2] initially the King went with his government to Greece, then to Jerusalem in the British Mandate of Palestine, and to Cairo. He went to the United Kingdom in June 1941, where he joined numerous other governments in exile from Nazi-occupied Europe.[3] The King completed his education at Cambridge University and joined the Royal Air Force.

Iz clanka:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleiburg_repatriations

Bleiburg repatriations (see terminology) is a term encompassing events that took place after the end of World War II in Europe, when tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians associated with the Axis fleeing Yugoslavia were repatriated to that country. Thousands were reportedly murdered or subjected to forced labor camps. The events are named for the Carinthian border town of Bleiburg, where the main repatriation was conducted.

Tito je faca.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812
The War of 1812 was a military conflict, lasting for two-and-a-half years, fought by the United States of America against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, its North American colonies, and its American Indian allies.

The American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), the American War of Independence,[N 1] or simply the Revolutionary War in the United States, was the rebellion of thirteen of the North American colonies of Great Britain who declared themselves independent in 1776 as the United States of America.[N 2][20] France signed an alliance with the new nation in 1778, which escalated the conflict into a world war between Britain and France, Spain, and the Netherlands. Contemporaneous fighting broke out in India between the British East India Company and the French allied Kingdom of Mysore.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War
The war had its origins in the resistance of many Americans to taxes imposed by the British parliament, which they claimed were unconstitutional. Patriot protests escalated into boycotts and the destruction of a shipment of tea at the Boston Tea Party. The British government punished Massachusetts by closing the port of Boston and altering its charter. The Patriots in Massachusetts responded by setting up a shadow government which took control of the province outside of Boston. Twelve other colonies supported Massachusetts, formed a Continental Congress to coordinate their resistance, and set up committees and conventions which effectively seized power from the royal governments. In April 1775 fighting broke out between Massachusetts militia units and British regulars at Lexington and Concord. The Continental Congress appointed General George Washington to take charge of militia units besieging British forces in Boston, who were forced to evacuate in March 1776.

Tito je kaznil vse lopove in tako je prav

Iz:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment

The term “concentration camp” saw wider use during the Second Boer War (1899–1902), when the British operated such camps in South Africa for interning Boers.[9][10] They built a total of 45 tented camps for Boer internees and 64 for black Africans. Of the 28,000 Boer men captured as prisoners of war, the British sent 25,630 overseas. The vast majority of Boers remaining in the local camps were women and children,[11] over 26,000 of whom died there.[11][12] During the 20th century, the arbitrary internment of civilians by the state reached a climax with Nazi concentration camps (1933–1945). As a result, the term “concentration camp” today carries many of the connotations of “extermination camp” (or “death camp”).

Ja se zato pa se danes, doben ne krade ja..
Ravno nasprotno ja..

Ce bi jih in ce bi se v njegovem casu vzgjalo v tem smislu pod njegovo vlado..
danes ne bi bilo tkao kot je..
Genercije po 1991..so bile vzgojene in odrasle, v solstvo in v solstvu druge Jugoslavije , ko0t jo je zacrtala Titova valda in financirala..

You know that uneasy feeling you get when you see that subtle change change in her. She starts spending more time at the gym, doing her makeup or hair a little different, seems a bit happier and she’s spending more and more time “out with the girls.” That uneasy feeling is me, or someone like me.
Let me preface this by saying I know what I’m doing is wrong. I know it has the potential to tear families apart, break hearts and create scars that will last a lifetime. It hurts me. Every single time I do it, it cuts into me deeper than the last. I’m not proud of it, in fact I hide it from everyone in my life, even my closest friends. Which is why it feels good to write this. That’s not to say I don’t get anything from it, because I do. But first a little context.
I’m 28, single, live in a major metropolitan city and have a comfortable life. I have great family and friends, and have no problem meeting unattached women.
Three years ago I met a woman, let’s call her Melissa, who was at the tail end of a divorce. We met at the gym and despite a bit of an age gap, we hit it off instantly. She was still living with the guy, a cop, who wasn’t quite abusive but certainly didn’t treat her well.
She was completely upfront about her situation and said she wasn’t really interested in meeting anyone. I told her I understood, that’s wasn’t my angle (truthfully, it wasn’t) and that if she ever just wanted to talk and get the perspective of a guy, I’d be happy to listen. She seemed so taken aback that someone wanted to listen, that someone actually cared about how she felt, so grateful for some intimacy even on a platonic level, it just gave me a good feeling to know that maybe I was helping her in some way – at least in my mind.
So over the span of a couple days, coffee and talking turns to drinks and laughing. I don’t know her well, but I can already see a change in her. Like a weight has been lifted off her shoulders and maybe she just needs a little fun in her life right now. Drinks turn to poor decision making and as I go to drop her off, the evening ends with Melissa bent over the hood of my car in her garage having the loudest orgasm I’ve ever heard (she lived in a high rise building with underground parking so husband wasn’t likely to stumble on us). After that, our dynamic pretty much turns physical. We fuck everywhere. My place sometimes, her place when her husband is at work, the car, the gym, the beach. Frankly it’s great. It’s hot, is feels a little dirty and forbidden and she fucks like she hasn’t gotten off in years – which very well could have been true.
I think that’s about where something clicked for me. I wasn’t really meeting women that I could see spending any amount of time with, and with Melissa, I was giving her something that made her feel desired, acknowledged and appreciated. The quid-pro-quo here, I got great sex and the feeling that maybe I had helped her out a bit.
Few weeks later, she tells me that she’s going to try and work things out with her husband. I tell her I’m happy for her and I hope it works. We hug goodbye and haven’t spoke since. In no way am I suggesting that I had anything to do with her and her husband getting back together….just explaining how it tapered off.
Here’s where the shameful part begins. Since then, I’ve actively began seeking out married women. Almost exclusively. I would say at least 50. It’s shocking how easy it is. I’m not married, so I don’t know much about the intricacies of marital bliss, but I will tell you that there are SO many women out there who are angry, hurt, feel unappreciated and unfulfilled. They’re everywhere. I’ve had relationships with married women that I’ve met at the grocery store, gym, bookstore, malls, restaurants, coffee shops, ikea, fucking Home Depot. It is just so easy to spot. The prolonged eye contact, ring check, and bashful smile which is essentially an invitation to come talk to them. So many beautiful women (inside and out) that just get ignored by their husbands. MEN OF REDDIT – you want some insight into why your wife would cheat on you? The number one complaint that I hear as the man lying in bed next to your wife, “He just doesn’t listen to me.” Women are feeling driven. They need to be show affection, both physical and emotional. Perhaps more than anything, they need to feel loved and desired. That doesn’t mean with your fucking cock, it means picking up on the subtle cues when they’re unhappy or having a bad day and giving a fuck.
Maybe to a certain extent I am taking advantage of these women or where they are in their life. I used to tell myself that I was balancing it all out by giving them something that they were lacking at home. Whether physical or emotional.
Yesterday afternoon something happened that really stung deep. I know this is getting long so I’ll try to wrap it up here quickly.
So one of the women I’ve been seeing lately, let’s call her Jessica, is 36, very pretty and sweet, married mother of 3. We met a couple weeks ago at a bar when she was out with some girlfriends (Husbands of Reddit – another note, “out with girlfriends” is most likely time your wife is going to be talking to a guy like me. Not saying all women are prone to infidelity, but I’ve met several women in scenarios like this. Girlfriends keep their mouths shut.)
We start talking, hit it off well and within 15 minutes she’s telling me how tough things are with her husband. This…right here….those words…”having a tough time with my husband”…spoken to a stranger, it’s basically saying “hey, I need a break. need some excitement. I’m open to sleeping with you.” So a few drinks, I walk her to her car, we kiss and trade email addresses. (Husbands of Reddit – all indicent communication takes place on Facebook of via email. No phone. Just sayin’)
Next day I get an email telling how great it was to meet me and asking if I’d like to come to her yoga studio for a class I accept and class is great. We grab Jamba Juice afterwards……yadda, yadda, yadda….we end up fucking on the floor on a yoga mat. She’s awesome. Again, just one of those women that seems like she hasn’t been touched or show attention in years.
So we’ve been doing this for a couple weeks now. Same routine, I get a free yoga class and get to fuck the instructor afterwards. It’s actually been great, one of the best relationships like this I’ve had in a while and we get along so well. No expectations or innuendoes about the future of our relationship, just fun and enjoying each other.
Yesterday, same routine. I go to class, and after class we’re fooling around. The studio is essentially a big storefront with a small bathroom in the back and shades covering the windows in the front of the room. We typically just lock the front door and fuck on the floor towards the back of the room.
So the door is locked, we’re 45 minutes in, she’s on top and getting close, I put my hand on the back of her head and pull her face into the nook of my shoulder and we cum together. She pull’s her face away from my shoulder, kisses me and says “that was fun.”
As she starts to sit up and pull her hair into a pony tail, I literally see the color drain from her face and she immediately starts crying and shaking. I turn my head and there’s a guy standing about six feet away from us. It’s her husband. He let himself in. I get up real quick, dick still hard and condom filled cum, thinking I’m about to get the shit kicked out of me. The guy is crying. Hard. Not even looking at me, but instead at his wife, naked, kneeling on a yoga mat in the studio he helped build for her.
And this. Right here. Is the absolute lowest moment of my life. I feel like scum. Worse than scum. And I can feel myself start to tear up to thinking about this family that I just rained down disfunction on. The kids. And it’s not like it was some fucking mistake. It was me. I sought this out for my own perverted self gratifying reasons. I couldn’t go fuck some trixie at a bar, I had to purposely seek out a married woman. A fucking mother. A now my fucked up decisions have caused a family to fall apart.
I didn’t say a word. Pulled on my shorts, grabbed my clothes and mat and just walked out. They both stayed put and neither looked at me on the way out. The last thing I heard him say was “I don’t understand.”
So I’m done. I swear. This is my confession and it will serve as a reminder of the pain I’ve already caused and the potential harm that my own fucked up behavior can bring not just to one person, but to a whole family.
From the bottom of my heart – to the families that my actions affected. I am so very sorry. I was immature, irresponsible and exploitive. I’m so, so sorry.

Ja se zato pa se danes, doben ne krade ja..
Ravno nasprotno ja..

Ce bi jih in ce bi se v njegovem casu vzgjalo v tem smislu pod njegovo vlado..
danes ne bi bilo tkao kot je..
Genercije po 1991..so bile vzgojene in odrasle, v solstvo in v solstvu druge Jugoslavije , ko0t jo je zacrtala Titova valda in financirala..[/quote]
Pod titovo vladavino ni bilo niti 1 procent tstvin in privatizacij kot jih je v kapitalizmu.Če bi se držali njegovih naukov potem se ne bi zgodil istrabenz,patrija,pivovarna laško ,merkur itd itd.Desni so postali požrešni in so krajo legalizirali zato nam ga je sedaj.stari je pa takšne barabe zapiral in v korenu posekal lopovske gene.

Ja se zato pa se danes, doben ne krade ja..
Ravno nasprotno ja..

Ce bi jih in ce bi se v njegovem casu vzgjalo v tem smislu pod njegovo vlado..
danes ne bi bilo tkao kot je..
Genercije po 1991..so bile vzgojene in odrasle, v solstvo in v solstvu druge Jugoslavije , ko0t jo je zacrtala Titova valda in financirala..[/quote]
Pod titovo vladavino ni bilo niti 1 procent tstvin in privatizacij kot jih je v kapitalizmu.Če bi se držali njegovih naukov potem se ne bi zgodil istrabenz,patrija,pivovarna laško ,merkur itd itd.Desni so postali požrešni in so krajo legalizirali zato nam ga je sedaj.stari je pa takšne barabe zapiral in v korenu posekal lopovske gene.[/quote]

Ja po 1945..so vse z nationalizirali, in so ukinili privat lastnino kao..
tako da doben ni mogel nic vkrasti dobenemu vec ker doben ni vec nic mel..

“Zastojn ste prejeli , zastojn dajajte”..

Pa se do danes je v vecini stavri v drzavnih lastninah..drugje po svetu ni tako ne

Po 1991 je samo tkao kot je Titova vlada uzakonila..

Iz strani:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid

Apartheid (Afrikaans pronunciation: [ɐˈpartɦɛit]; an Afrikaans[1] word meaning “the state of being apart”, literally “apart-hood”)[2][3] was a system of racial segregation in South Africa enforced through legislation by the National Party (NP), the governing party from 1948 to 1994. Under apartheid, the rights, associations, and movements of the majority black inhabitants and other ethnic groups were curtailed and Afrikaner minority rule was maintained. Apartheid was developed after World War II by the Afrikaner-dominated National Party and Broederbond organizations. The ideology was also enforced in South West Africa, which was administered by South Africa under a League of Nations mandate (revoked in 1966 via United Nations Resolution 2145),[4] until it gained independence as Namibia in 1990.[5] By extension, the term is nowadays currently used for forms of systematic segregation, established by the state authority in a country, against the social and civil rights of a certain group of citizens, due to ethnic prejudices.


Pod titovo vladavino ni bilo niti 1 procent tstvin in privatizacij kot jih je v kapitalizmu.Če bi se držali njegovih naukov potem se ne bi zgodil istrabenz,patrija,pivovarna laško ,merkur itd itd.Desni so postali požrešni in so krajo legalizirali zato nam ga je sedaj.stari je pa takšne barabe zapiral in v korenu posekal lopovske gene.[/quote]

Ja po 1945..so vse z nationalizirali, in so ukinili privat lastnino kao..
tako da doben ni mogel nic vkrasti dobenemu vec ker doben ni vec nic mel..

“Zastojn ste prejeli , zastojn dajajte”..

Pa se do danes je v vecini stavri v drzavnih lastninah..drugje po svetu ni tako ne

Po 1991 je samo tkao kot je Titova vlada uzakonila..[/quote]

Dejstvo je da je na celem podrocju Dinarskega gorstva slabo..dosti slabse kot drugje an svetu..
in drugje po svetu, niso imeli dolgo vladavino Titve vlade.
tu na Dinarskem gorstvu je bila dolga vladavina Titve vlade, ki je tudi usvtarila vse te Republike, ki so postale neodvisne drzave leta 1991..

komu to koristi, ni znano,..ocitno ljudem na dinaskem gorstvu ne, ne v”Republiki Bosni in Herzegovini ne, Ocitno ljudem v “Republiki Hrvaski ne “..in ne ljudem tukaj..
ocitno ljudem na Kosovu ne..in tako dlaje..

Ja po 1945..so vse z nationalizirali, in so ukinili privat lastnino kao..
tako da doben ni mogel nic vkrasti dobenemu vec ker doben ni vec nic mel..

“Zastojn ste prejeli , zastojn dajajte”..

Pa se do danes je v vecini stavri v drzavnih lastninah..drugje po svetu ni tako ne

Po 1991 je samo tkao kot je Titova vlada uzakonila..[/quote]

Dejstvo je da je na celem podrocju Dinarskega gorstva slabo..dosti slabse kot drugje an svetu..
in drugje po svetu, niso imeli dolgo vladavino Titve vlade.
tu na Dinarskem gorstvu je bila dolga vladavina Titve vlade, ki je tudi usvtarila vse te Republike, ki so postale neodvisne drzave leta 1991..

komu to koristi, ni znano,..ocitno ljudem na dinaskem gorstvu ne, ne v”Republiki Bosni in Herzegovini ne, Ocitno ljudem v “Republiki Hrvaski ne “..in ne ljudem tukaj..
ocitno ljudem na Kosovu ne..in tako dlaje..[/quote]

Seveda Tita ni vec od 1980, tako da Tito sigurno ni odgovoren zato kaj se dogaja in se je dogajalo po 1980..do danes..

Prav tako ni odgovoren za to kaj je danes, ne Hitler ne Stalin, ne Churchill , ne Tito,..(ker doben od teh ze dolgo ne zivi vec)

Ampak samo mi sami, ki zivimo v tem casu..in smo odrasli ljudje …mi samo smo odgovorni zato kako je danes.

Ja se zato pa se danes, doben ne krade ja..
Ravno nasprotno ja..

Ce bi jih in ce bi se v njegovem casu vzgjalo v tem smislu pod njegovo vlado..
danes ne bi bilo tkao kot je..
Genercije po 1991..so bile vzgojene in odrasle, v solstvo in v solstvu druge Jugoslavije , ko0t jo je zacrtala Titova valda in financirala..[/quote]
Pod titovo vladavino ni bilo niti 1 procent tstvin in privatizacij kot jih je v kapitalizmu.Če bi se držali njegovih naukov potem se ne bi zgodil istrabenz,patrija,pivovarna laško ,merkur itd itd.Desni so postali požrešni in so krajo legalizirali zato nam ga je sedaj.stari je pa takšne barabe zapiral in v korenu posekal lopovske gene.[/quote]

Komunizem ali socializem komunističnega tipa nista nikjer uspešna. Uspešne so le kapitalistične države, ki poleg ostalega upoštevajo nedotakljivost privatne lastnine, svoboden trg in svobodno ustvarjalnost.
Kar sem omenjal in naštel, se da zlahka opazovati po vsem svetu. In potem primerjati.


Pod titovo vladavino ni bilo niti 1 procent tstvin in privatizacij kot jih je v kapitalizmu.Če bi se držali njegovih naukov potem se ne bi zgodil istrabenz,patrija,pivovarna laško ,merkur itd itd.Desni so postali požrešni in so krajo legalizirali zato nam ga je sedaj.stari je pa takšne barabe zapiral in v korenu posekal lopovske gene.[/quote]

Komunizem ali socializem komunističnega tipa nista nikjer uspešna. Uspešne so le kapitalistične države, ki poleg ostalega upoštevajo nedotakljivost privatne lastnine, svoboden trg in svobodno ustvarjalnost.
Kar sem omenjal in naštel, se da zlahka opazovati po vsem svetu. In potem primerjati.[/quote]

Citat od Nelsona Mandela:

“Komunisti so vedno igrali aktivno vlogo v trudu colonilalnih(koloniziranih?) dezel za svobodo, ker kratkorocni objektivi komunistov, bodo vedno doziveli odziv dolgorocnih objektivov gibanj za svobodo.”

Communists have always played an active role in the fight by colonial countries for their freedom, because the short-term objects of Communism would always correspond with the long-term objects of freedom movements.
Nelson Mandela
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/n/nelson_mandela_3.html#l3MVBLiJUY3tWrsJ.99

Ja, Jugoslavija je bila neuspešna in zato je tudi propadla. Za nekatere tega dejstva sploh ni. Nekateri še vedno mislijo, da je Jugoslavija propadla zato, ker je vanjo treščil asteroid.

to je dober izrek Nelsona Mandele

Denar ne bo ustvaril uspeha.
Svoboda delati (ustvarjati) denar bo ustvarila uspeh.
Money won’t create success, the freedom to make it will.
Nelson Mandela

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/n/nelson_mandela.html#4wgkxIOqDuWsShmL.99

Ja kapitalizem je uspešen in sicer v odlični izvedbi tam kjer delavcu vržejo drobtinice sebi pa banda lena pobere maslo.Ajde ne serji s tem kapitalizmom kjer dobi edino tisti ,ki nič ne dela tuja muka je sladka a ne

Ja se Karl Marks ind Fridrich Engels sta zivela v Veliki Britaniji in kritizirala sistem ki ga je imel Britanski imperij.
Tito pa je bil v zaveznistvu z Britanskim imperijem..Britanci in njihova imprijalna politika, ni podpirla Kralja v jugolaviji ampak Tita..oz je Tito sluzil interesom Britanskega imperija najbtz morda.

New Report

Close